Anouk Koevermans vs Tilwith Di Girolami Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Koevermans vs Girolami analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouk Koevermans vs Tilwith Di Girolami Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Koevermans 0 - 0 Girolami
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Koevermans has won 40.82% of points on their second serve, while Girolami has won 42.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Koevermans, in recent form, has won 56.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Girolami has won 57.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.9% and 40.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Koevermans has saved 53.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Girolami has saved 49.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Koevermans has won 67.11% of matches played (W/L 51/ 25), with Girolami winning 46.81% (W/L 22/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Koevermans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 34/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Girolami has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 30/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Koevermans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.44% of matches (W/L 50/ 22), where as Girolami has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Koevermans has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.08 while Girolami has played against players with an average rank of 126.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Koevermans has won 66% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Girolami has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Koevermans has converted 46.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Girolami has converted 42.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
1
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
296
Rank
296
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
866
Rank
625
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
61% (115-74)
Career Total W/L
51% (72-68)
65% (26-14)
YTD W/L
48% (16-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Anouk Koevermans vs Tilwith Di Girolami For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Koevermans VS Girolami
Koevermans VS Girolami H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Anouk Koevermans | Tilwith Di Girolami |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (26/14) | 48% (16/17) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (60/42) | 49% (38/39) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (519/456) | 51% (369/361) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 57% (4/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 68% (19/9) | 45% (10/12) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (2/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 47 | 9 |
DFs per game | 0.5 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 239 | 99 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:28 | 1:40:7 |
Avg Opp Rank | 293.6 | 129.18 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1735/2803) | 75% (1652/2199) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (1036/1735) | 55% (908/1652) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (436/1068) | 43% (236/547) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (198/423) | 44% (146/331) |
Return Pts W% | 50% (1431/2850) | 47% (1097/2310) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 69% (25/11) | 38% (3/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (13/12) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (26/40) | 48% (16/33) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 22% (2/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 64% (14/22) | 45% (5/11) |
1st set W, W | 80% (25/20) | 79% (14/11) |
1st set W, L | 20% (25/5) | 21% (14/3) |
1st set L, W | 40% (15/6) | 26% (19/5) |
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Magali Kempen
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lola Radivojevic
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
54 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
115
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Martina Okalova
67%
(
87 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
101 of
142)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
48%
(
62 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
70 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
134
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lucie Urbanova
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
91)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Anouk Koevermans
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
75%
(
81 of
108)
1st Serve %
78%
(
89 of
114)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Gina Feistel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
68 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Mboko
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Tilwith Di Girolami Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Katrina Scott
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daria Kuczer
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
68 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Maileen Nuudi
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gina Feistel
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
75 of
98)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ana Giraldi Requena
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
83%
(
59 of
71)
1
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Koevermans Vs Girolami Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Koevermans are available here and Girolami photos here.